From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendez v. Maass

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 8, 1992
113 Or. App. 231 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

90C-10239; CA A64202

Argued and submitted April 24, 1992

Affirmed May 20, 1992 Reconsideration denied June 24, 1992 Petition for review allowed by memorandum decision October 8, 1992 See 314 Or. 385 (1992)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County.

Robert B. McConville, Judge.

Velda H. Rogers, Keizer, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.


Affirmed. Boone v. Wright, 110 Or. App. 281, 822 P.2d 719 (1991), rev allowed 313 Or. 209 (1992).


Summaries of

Mendez v. Maass

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 8, 1992
113 Or. App. 231 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Mendez v. Maass

Case Details

Full title:MANUEL MENDEZ, Appellant, v. Manfred MAASS, Respondent

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 8, 1992

Citations

113 Or. App. 231 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
830 P.2d 636