From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendez v. Citibank

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 29, 2021
21 Civ. 7978 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 29, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civ. 7978 (PAE)

11-29-2021

JOSE L. MENDEZ, Plaintiff, v. CITIBANK, N.A., EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC, and TRANSUNION LLC, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISCONTINUANCE

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, DISTRICT JUDGE:

The Court having been advised at Dkt. 26 that all claims as between plaintiff and defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc, have been settled in principle, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to plaintiffs right to reopen the action within 45 days of the date of this Order as to defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. if the settlement is not consummated.

To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within 45 days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same 45-day period to be "so ordered" by the Court. Per Paragraph 4(C) of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate Experian Information Solutions, Inc. as a party,

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mendez v. Citibank

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 29, 2021
21 Civ. 7978 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Mendez v. Citibank

Case Details

Full title:JOSE L. MENDEZ, Plaintiff, v. CITIBANK, N.A., EXPERIAN INFORMATION…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 29, 2021

Citations

21 Civ. 7978 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 29, 2021)