From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendez v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 21, 2013
Case No.: 1:11-cv-02154-LJO-JLT (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:11-cv-02154-LJO-JLT

02-21-2013

ROBERT MENDEZ, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S REQUEST

TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL (Doc. 18)


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO

SEAL DOCUMENTS

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding in propria persona with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On April 5, 2012, Respondent filed the Answer and lodged various documents in support of the Answer. (Docs. 15 & 16). The documents included sealed transcripts of Petitioner's October 3, 2008 and November 13, 2008 Marsden hearings, conducted in camera before the trial judge. On April 11, 2012, subsequent to filing the Answer and supporting documents, Respondent filed the instant request to keep those two Marsden transcripts under seal. (Doc. 18).

Pursuant to Local Rule 141(a), "[d]ocuments may be sealed only by written order of the Court, upon the showing required by applicable law." The process, as described in the Local Rule, is initiated by the filing of a Notice and a Request to Seal Documents. Id. In the latter document, the moving party "shall set forth the statutory or other authority for sealing, the requested duration, the identity, by name or category, of persons to be permitted access to the documents, and all other relevant information." Id.

Here, Petitioner has based his request on Local Rule 141, he has identified the specific pages to be sealed, and he has set forth the grounds for sealing said documents, i.e., that the State of California deems the documents confidential in order to preserve the privacy interests of Petitioner created by California law.

GOOD CAUSE having been presented, it is HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Respondent's request to seal documents (Doc. 18), is GRANTED;
2. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to seal the requested documents and to limit access to those documents to those parties specified in Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 8.328. The documents to be sealed include:
a. Reporter's Transcript of Sealed Marsden Hearing, Volume 12-A, pages 1451-1500;
b. (2) Reporter's Transcript of Sealed Marsden Hearing, Volume 14-A, pages 1604-1605.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Jennifer L. Thurston

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

People v. Marsden, 2 Cal.3d 118 (1970).


Summaries of

Mendez v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 21, 2013
Case No.: 1:11-cv-02154-LJO-JLT (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Mendez v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT MENDEZ, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 21, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 1:11-cv-02154-LJO-JLT (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)