From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Menard v. Imig

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 22, 2019
926 N.W.2d 801 (Mich. 2019)

Opinion

SC: 158563 COA: 336220

05-22-2019

Ryan MENARD, BY his conservator, Shelly MENARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Terry R. IMIG and Sharryl Ann Everson, Defendants, and Macomb County Department of Roads and County of Macomb, Defendants-Appellees.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 6, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on the application. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The appellant shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of this order addressing: (1) whether the Court of Appeals erred in its determination of cause-in-fact; and (2) whether the narrowing of the roadway combined with the oncoming driver’s use of high-beam headlights, or any other cause-in-fact, was a proximate cause of the accident. In addition to the brief, the appellant shall electronically file an appendix conforming to MCR 7.312(D)(2). In the brief, citations to the record must provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellees shall file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the appellant’s brief. The appellees shall also electronically file an appendix, or in the alternative, stipulate to the use of the appendix filed by the appellant. A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellant within 14 days of being served with the appellees’ brief. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.


Summaries of

Menard v. Imig

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 22, 2019
926 N.W.2d 801 (Mich. 2019)
Case details for

Menard v. Imig

Case Details

Full title:RYAN MENARD, by his conservator, SHELLY MENARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: May 22, 2019

Citations

926 N.W.2d 801 (Mich. 2019)