From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mena v. Kelso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 2, 2013
No. 2:12-CV-1799-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-CV-1799-CMK-P

01-02-2013

SALVADOR MENA, Plaintiff, v. J. CLARK KELSO, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 22, 2012, the court directed plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 30 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file an amended complaint may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. To date, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

Plaintiff shall show cause in writing, within 30 days of the date of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff is again warned that failure to respond to this order may result in dismissal of the action for the reasons outlined above, as well as for failure to prosecute and comply with court rules and orders. See id.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Mena v. Kelso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 2, 2013
No. 2:12-CV-1799-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2013)
Case details for

Mena v. Kelso

Case Details

Full title:SALVADOR MENA, Plaintiff, v. J. CLARK KELSO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 2, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-CV-1799-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2013)