From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Melville v. U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jan 7, 2009
CASE NO. 2:06-CV-992, CRIM. NO. 2:91-CR-023 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 7, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:06-CV-992, CRIM. NO. 2:91-CR-023.

January 7, 2009


OPINION AND ORDER


On November 17, 2008, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing be granted and that petitioner be appointed counsel to represent him at an evidentiary hearing on his claim that the prosecutor improperly failed to disclose or correct the allegedly false testimony of prosecution witness Ken Adams who denied the existence of an agreement to reduce his sentence in return for his testimony against petitioner. The Magistrate Judge further recommended that petitioner's claim of prosecutorial misconduct based upon Adams' allegedly false testimony denying that he had met with police and the prosecution prior to testifying be dismissed as without merit. Petitioner has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. For the reasons that follow, petitioner's objections are OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED.

Petitioner objects to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation of dismissal of his claim of prosecutorial misconduct as without merit. Petitioner again raises all of the same arguments that he previously presented regarding all of his claims. Petitioner asserts that he is actually innocent of the charges against him. He refers to his PreSentence Investigation Report in support of such allegation, wherein he denied involvement in the offenses charged. See Exhibit A to Objections.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. For the reasons detailed therein, this Court likewise concludes that petitioner's claim of prosecutorial misconduct based upon the prosecutor's failure to disclose or correct Adams' allegedly false testimony denying that he had met with police or the prosecutor prior to testifying lacks merit. The Court also concludes that the record warrants an evidentiary hearing on petitioner's remaining claim of prosecutorial misconduct.

Therefore, petitioner's objections are OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Petitioner shall be appointed counsel to represent him at an evidentiary hearing on his claim that the prosecutor improperly failed to disclose or correct the allegedly false testimony of Ken Adams regarding the existence of an agreement to reduce his sentence in return for testifying against petitioner. Petitioner's remaining claim relating to Adams' allegedly false testimony regarding whether or not he had met with police and prosecution prior to testifying is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Melville v. U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jan 7, 2009
CASE NO. 2:06-CV-992, CRIM. NO. 2:91-CR-023 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 7, 2009)
Case details for

Melville v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:CLAIRMONT MELVILLE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jan 7, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. 2:06-CV-992, CRIM. NO. 2:91-CR-023 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 7, 2009)