From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mello v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Apr 8, 2009
No. 04-08-00671-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 8, 2009)

Opinion

No. 04-08-00671-CR

Delivered and Filed: April 8, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appealed from the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, Trial Court No. 2002CR3122, Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding. Affirmed.

Sitting: SANDEE BRYAN MARION, Justice, PHYLIS J. SPEEDLIN, Justice, MARIALYN BARNARD, Justice.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Joseph Mello pled true to violating the conditions of his probation. His guilt was adjudicated, and he was sentenced to thirty-five years imprisonment. Mello's court-appointed attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel concludes that the appeal has no merit. Counsel provided Mello with a copy of the brief and informed him of his right to review the record and file his own brief. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n. 1 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Mello did not file a pro se brief. After reviewing the record and counsel's brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Appellate counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns 924 S.W.2d at 177 n. 1. No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Mello wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Mello must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or Mello must file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the date of either this opinion or the last timely motion for rehearing that is overruled by this court. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with this court, after which it will be forwarded to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.3, 68.7. Any petition for discretionary review should comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.4.


Summaries of

Mello v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Apr 8, 2009
No. 04-08-00671-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 8, 2009)
Case details for

Mello v. State

Case Details

Full title:Joseph MELLO, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Apr 8, 2009

Citations

No. 04-08-00671-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 8, 2009)