Opinion
Argued February 27, 1893
Decided March 14, 1893
Henry Daily, Jr., for appellant.
George Hill for respondents.
Per Curiam opinion for affirmance.
All concur.
Order affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Mellen v. Mellen
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 14, 1893
33 N.E. 744 (N.Y. 1893)
Summaries of
Mellen v. Mellen
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 14, 1893
33 N.E. 744 (N.Y. 1893)
Case details for
Mellen v. Mellen
Case Details
Full title:SARAH E. MELLEN, Appellant, v . ABNER MELLEN et al., Respondents
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 14, 1893
Citations
33 N.E. 744 (N.Y. 1893)
33 N.E. 744
51 N.Y. St. Rptr. 73
Citing Cases
Wold v. League of the Cross
Where the judgment contains provisions which are distinct and independent, as where several independent…
Matter of SilvermanI dissent. The rule is well settled that ordinarily a party who accepts the benefit of a judgment or order…