From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Melgoza v. City of Modesto

UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO
Jan 11, 2013
No. 1:11-CV-00066-AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2013)

Opinion

No. 1:11-CV-00066-AWI-BAM

01-11-2013

LILIA MELGOZA, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MODESTO, MODESTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER SHANE CASTRO, SGT. TIMOTHY HELTON, and DOES 1 to 100, Defendants.

SUSANA ALCALA WOOD, SB#156366 JAMES F. WILSON, Senior Deputy City Attorney #107289 Attorneys for Defendants Alonzo J. Gradford (SB# 244201) LAW OFFICE OF ALONZO J. GRADFORD Sanjay S. Schmidt (SB# 247475) LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT Attorneys for Plaintiff


SUSANA ALCALA WOOD, SB#156366
JAMES F. WILSON, Senior Deputy City Attorney #107289
Attorneys for Defendants
Alonzo J. Gradford (SB# 244201)
LAW OFFICE OF ALONZO J. GRADFORD
Sanjay S. Schmidt (SB# 247475)
LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT
Attorneys for Plaintiff

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR

DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN CLAIMS

AGAINST DEFENDANTS CITY OF

MODESTO, MODESTO POLICE

DEPARTMENT AND SHANE CASTRO


STIPULATION

The parties to the above-entitled action, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. Plaintiff's second cause of action raising a Title 42 U.S.C. section 1983 claim against the defendant City of Modesto shall be dismissed with prejudice;

2. In recognition of the fact that plaintiff's third cause of action claiming "assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury" is subsumed in plaintiff's fourth cause of action for assault, plaintiff's third cause of action for "assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury" shall be dismissed with prejudice;

3. Plaintiff's ninth cause of action under California Civil Code section 51.9 for sexual harassment shall be dismissed with prejudice;

4. Plaintiff's tenth cause of action under California Civil Code section 52.1 shall be dismissed without prejudice to its renewal and further litigation in this action if the current case law requiring an act or threat of violence separate from the constitutional violation claimed is changed so as to remove that requirement prior to the completion of the trial in this action.

It is further stipulated and agreed that, as to each and every cause of action so dismissed pursuant to this stipulation, each party shall bear his, her or its own costs of litigation, including attorney's fees.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

SUSANA ALCALA WOOD

City Attorney

By: __________

JAMES F. WILSON

Senior Deputy City Attorney

Attorneys for Defendants

LAW OFFICE OF ALONZO J. GRADFORD

LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT

By: __________

SANJAY S. SCHMIDT

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties which is recited above, certain claims brought by the plaintiff Lilia Melgoza against the defendants City of Modesto, Modesto Police Department and/or Shane Castro in the within action shall be, and hereby are dismissed as follows:

1. Plaintiff's second cause of action raising a Title 42 U.S.C. section 1983 claim against the defendant City of Modesto shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

2. Plaintiff's third cause of action claiming "assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury" is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

3. Plaintiff's ninth cause of action under California Civil Code section 51.9 for sexual harassment is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

4. Plaintiff's tenth cause of action under California Civil Code section 52.1 shall be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to its renewal and further litigation in this action if the current case law requiring an act or threat of violence separate from the constitutional violation claimed is changed so as to remove that requirement prior to the completion of the trial in this action.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to that same stipulation, as to each and every cause of action so dismissed pursuant to this stipulation and order, each party shall bear his, her or its own costs of litigation, including attorney's fees. IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Melgoza v. City of Modesto

UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO
Jan 11, 2013
No. 1:11-CV-00066-AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Melgoza v. City of Modesto

Case Details

Full title:LILIA MELGOZA, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MODESTO, MODESTO POLICE DEPARTMENT…

Court:UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO

Date published: Jan 11, 2013

Citations

No. 1:11-CV-00066-AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2013)