From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Melgadejo v. S&D Fruits & Vegetables Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 9, 2016
No. 12-CV-6852 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 9, 2016)

Opinion

No. 12-CV-6852 (RA)

02-09-2016

FLORENTINO MELGADEJO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. S&D FRUITS & VEGETABLES INC., et al., Defendants.


OPINION ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

:

Plaintiffs initiated this collective action pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") and New York Labor Law ("NYLL") on September 11, 2012. See Dkt. 1. On February 21, 2014, the Court entered a default judgment against all Defendants for failure to appear in this action. See Dkt. 64. The same day, the Court referred this case to Magistrate Judge Pitman to conduct an inquest regarding the proper scope of Plaintiffs' damages. See Dkt. 65. On October 23, 2015, Judge Pitman issued a detailed, 90-page Report & Recommendation (the "Report") describing the various categories of damages to which each of the nine individual Plaintiffs are entitled and calculating those damages as to each of the three separate Defendants. See Dkt. 74. The Court has received no objections to the Report, and hereby adopts it in its entirety.

A district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Parties may object to a magistrate judge's recommended findings "[w]ithin 14 days after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). "When the parties make no objections to the Report, the Court may adopt the Report if 'there is no clear error on the face of the record.'" Smith v. Corizon Health Services, No. 14-CV-8839 (GBD), 2015 WL 6123563, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 16, 2015) (quoting Adee Motor Cars, LLC v. Amato, 388 F. Supp. 2d 250, 253 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)).

The Court has reviewed the Report for clear error and found none. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report. Plaintiffs shall submit a proposed judgment to the Court no later than February 19, 2016. SO ORDERED. Dated: February 9, 2016

New York, New York

/s/_________

Ronnie Abrams

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Melgadejo v. S&D Fruits & Vegetables Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 9, 2016
No. 12-CV-6852 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 9, 2016)
Case details for

Melgadejo v. S&D Fruits & Vegetables Inc.

Case Details

Full title:FLORENTINO MELGADEJO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. S&D FRUITS & VEGETABLES INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Feb 9, 2016

Citations

No. 12-CV-6852 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 9, 2016)

Citing Cases

Castillo v. Perfume Worldwide Inc.

Short rest periods running from "5 minutes to about 20 minutes" must be counted toward an employee's "working…

Cabrera v. Dream Team Tavern Corp.

Based on this distinction in purpose, courts have found that a Plaintiff may recover liquidated damages under…