Opinion
June 3, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We find no merit to the appellant's contention that the Supreme Court erred in apportioning the legal fees in this case without holding an evidentiary hearing. Both the appellant and the plaintiffs' current attorney submitted evidence in support of their respective contentions, thereby providing the Supreme Court with an ample basis to render a determination ( see, Rondinelli v Yabuki, 224 A.D.2d 404). Balletta, J.P., Rosenblatt, Thompson and Copertino, JJ., concur.