From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Melegrito v. Citimortgage Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California Oakland Division
Aug 3, 2011
No. C 11-01765 LB (N.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-01765 LB

08-03-2011

PATERNO Y MELEGRITO, Plaintiff, v. CITIMORTGAGE INC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiff Paterno Melegrito filed a complaint in this action on April 11, 2011. Complaint, ECF No. 1. The court dismissed his complaint on June 6, 2011 and gave him leave to amend the complaint. 6/6/11 Order, ECF No. 16. To date, Mr. Melegrito has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the court orders Mr. Melegrito to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. He must file a written response to this order to show cause by August 11, 2011.

Citations are to the Electronic Case File ("ECF") with pin cites to the electronic page number at the top of the document, not the pages at the bottom.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LAUREL BEELER

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Melegrito v. Citimortgage Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California Oakland Division
Aug 3, 2011
No. C 11-01765 LB (N.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Melegrito v. Citimortgage Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PATERNO Y MELEGRITO, Plaintiff, v. CITIMORTGAGE INC, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California Oakland Division

Date published: Aug 3, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-01765 LB (N.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2011)

Citing Cases

Whatley v. Bank of America

Plaintiff's promissory estoppel claim thus fails at the threshold requirement that a clear and unambiguous…

Whatley v. Bank of America, N.A.

Plaintiff's promissory estoppel claim thus fails at the threshold requirement that a clear and unambiguous…