From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Melani v. Chipotle Servs., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Sep 27, 2018
No. 3:17-cv-01177-AC (D. Or. Sep. 27, 2018)

Opinion

No. 3:17-cv-01177-AC

09-27-2018

JUSTIN MELANI, an individual, Plaintiff, v. CHIPOTLE SERVICES, LLC, a foreign limited liability company; CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC., a foreign corporation, Defendants.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation [46] on August 2, 2018, in which he recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff leave to amend his complaint. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation [46]. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint [26] is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 27 day of September, 2018

/s/_________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Melani v. Chipotle Servs., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Sep 27, 2018
No. 3:17-cv-01177-AC (D. Or. Sep. 27, 2018)
Case details for

Melani v. Chipotle Servs., LLC

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN MELANI, an individual, Plaintiff, v. CHIPOTLE SERVICES, LLC, a…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Sep 27, 2018

Citations

No. 3:17-cv-01177-AC (D. Or. Sep. 27, 2018)