From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meiyu Fan v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Servs. L. A. Asylum Office

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 7, 2022
CV22-6316-FMO(JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2022)

Opinion

CV22-6316-FMO(JEMx)

11-07-2022

Meiyu Fan v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Los Angeles Asylum Office


CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL RE: LACK OF PROSECUTION

THE HONORABLE FERNANDO M. OLGUIN, DISTRICT JUDGE

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). Generally, a defendant must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a). The court may dismiss the action prior to the 90 days, however, if plaintiff(s) has/have not diligently prosecuted the action. With respect to service of individuals and/or business entities in a foreign country, plaintiff shall exercise all reasonable diligence and attempt service within the 90-day time period.

In the present case, it appears that one or more of these time periods has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before December 5, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 78(b), the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of:

X Proof(s) of service of summons and complaint on the following defendant(s): all defendants
X An answer by the following defendant(s): all defendants on or before the date indicated above. Failure to file a timely response to this Order to Show Cause shall result in the action or the above defendant(s) being dismissed for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of the court. See Local Rule 41; Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 & 41(b); Link v Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962).


Summaries of

Meiyu Fan v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Servs. L. A. Asylum Office

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 7, 2022
CV22-6316-FMO(JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Meiyu Fan v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Servs. L. A. Asylum Office

Case Details

Full title:Meiyu Fan v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Los…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Nov 7, 2022

Citations

CV22-6316-FMO(JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2022)