From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meisner v. Zymogenetics, Inc.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 20, 2017
No. 16-2443 (4th Cir. Sep. 20, 2017)

Summary

denying plaintiff's proposed amendments to her Complaint based in part on futility

Summary of this case from Bruce v. Bank of Am.

Opinion

No. 16-2443

09-20-2017

RHONDA MEISNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ZYMOGENETICS, INC., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bristol Myers Squibb, Inc.; ZYMOGENETICS, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Zymogenetics, Inc.; BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB, INC.; TRACEY CALDARAZZO; JEFF FORTINO; STEPHANIE LEWIS, individually and as a member of Jackson Lewis, PC, Greenville; JACKSON LEWIS, LLP, Greenville; JACKSON LEWIS PC; JOHN DOES AND JANE DOES 1-10, (Whose name is unknown or as yet discovered), Defendants - Appellees.

Rhonda Meisner, Appellant Pro Se. Ellison F. McCoy, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:15-cv-03523-CMC) Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rhonda Meisner, Appellant Pro Se. Ellison F. McCoy, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Rhonda Meisner appeals the district court's orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying her motion to remand, denying her motion to recuse and for reconsideration, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Defendants' motion to dismiss, denying her motion to alter or amend the judgment, and taxing costs. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Meisner's motion to file a corrected informal opening brief and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Meisner v. ZymoGenetics, Inc., No. 3:15-cv-03523-CMC (D.S.C. Apr. 7, 2016; June 1, 2016; July 27, 2016; Sept. 15, 2016 & Nov. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Meisner v. Zymogenetics, Inc.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 20, 2017
No. 16-2443 (4th Cir. Sep. 20, 2017)

denying plaintiff's proposed amendments to her Complaint based in part on futility

Summary of this case from Bruce v. Bank of Am.
Case details for

Meisner v. Zymogenetics, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RHONDA MEISNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ZYMOGENETICS, INC., a…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 20, 2017

Citations

No. 16-2443 (4th Cir. Sep. 20, 2017)

Citing Cases

Bruce v. Bank of Am.

Meisner v. Zymogenetics, Inc, No. 3:15-CV-3523-CMC, 2016 WL 4858741, at *6 (D.S.C. Sept. 15, 2016), aff'd sub…

Brightview Grp. v. Glynn

Accordingly, in situations such as these, federal courts subsequent to Taylor have continued to apply settled…