Mehta v. Kuhl

Full title: RUKMINESH MEHTA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MAGGIE KUHL, Defendant-Appellee.

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: May 25, 2021

No. 21-1076 (4th Cir. May. 25, 2021)

Opinion

21-1076

05-25-2021

RUKMINESH MEHTA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MAGGIE KUHL, Defendant-Appellee.

Rukminesh Mehta, Appellant Pro Se.

PER CURIAM

UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: May 20, 2021

Amended: August 26, 2021

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:20-cv-00131-GMG-RWT)

Rukminesh Mehta, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Rukminesh Mehta appeals the district court's orders dismissing his civil action and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mehta v. Kuhl, No. 3:20-cv-00131-GMG-RWT (N.D. W.Va. Jan. 4 &7, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.