From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mehmood v. Falk

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Apr 13, 2015
2:15-cv-0673-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2015)

Opinion


YASIR MEHMOOD, Plaintiff, v. FALK, et al., Defendants. No. 2:15-cv-0673-EFB P United States District Court, E.D. California. April 13, 2015

          ORDER

          EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff is a pretrial detainee proceeding without counsel in a civil action. He has submitted an affidavit requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). He has not, however, submitted a certified trust account statement.

         Section 1915(a)(2) requires "a prisoner seeking to bring a civil action without prepayment of fees or security therefor, in addition to filing the affidavit filed under paragraph (1), shall submit a certified copy of the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint..., obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which the prisoner is or was confined." Plaintiff has not submitted a certified copy of his trust account statement or the institutional equivalent. He may comply with this requirement by having prison officials complete the "Certificate" portion of the form application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

         Accordingly, plaintiff has 30 days from the date this order is served to submit the required trust account statement. Failure to comply with this order may result dismissal of this case. The Clerk of the court is directed to send to plaintiff a new form Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by a Prisoner.

         So ordered.


Summaries of

Mehmood v. Falk

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Apr 13, 2015
2:15-cv-0673-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2015)
Case details for

Mehmood v. Falk

Case Details

Full title:YASIR MEHMOOD, Plaintiff, v. FALK, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 13, 2015

Citations

2:15-cv-0673-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2015)