From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Megrave v. Dir. of the California Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 15, 2012
CASE NO. 11-CV-2573 (S.D. Cal. May. 15, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 11-CV-2573

05-15-2012

HASSIE MEGRAVE, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Megrave filed a § 2254 habeas petition on November 3, 2011. After receiving a notice from the Court regarding a possible failure on his part to exhaust his claims in state court, Megrave filed a motion for voluntary dismissal of his unexhausted claims on December 29, 2011. On January 30, 2012, Magistrate Judge Lewis issued a Report and Recommendation suggesting that Megrave's motion be granted and that his habeas petition be dismissed without prejudice. Respondent subsequently filed a notice of non-opposition.

The Court ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety. Megrave's motion for voluntary dismissal of his unexhausted claims is GRANTED, and his petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Respondent needn't file an answer to Megrave's petition at this time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________

HONORABLE LARRY ALAN BURNS

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Megrave v. Dir. of the California Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 15, 2012
CASE NO. 11-CV-2573 (S.D. Cal. May. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Megrave v. Dir. of the California Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:HASSIE MEGRAVE, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 15, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 11-CV-2573 (S.D. Cal. May. 15, 2012)