From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Megna v. Tishman Constr. Corp. of Manhattan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 19, 2003
306 A.D.2d 163 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Summary

In Megna, plaintiff, an elevator helper at a construction site, was injured when a temporary two-step wooden staircase leading to a temporary wooden landing collapsed under his weight and he fell to the ground.

Summary of this case from Brown v. 44th Street Development, LLC

Opinion

1473

June 19, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered July 5, 2002, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240(1), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Jeffrey M. Motelson, for plaintiff-respondent.

Paul F. McAloon, for defendants-appellants.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Rosenberger, Gonzalez, JJ.


Plaintiff, an elevator helper at a construction site, was injured when a temporary two-step wooden staircase leading to a temporary wooden landing collapsed under his weight and he fell to the ground. As the temporary stairway was being used to facilitate plaintiff's access to a different elevation level, and therefore indisputably an elevation device within the meaning of Labor Law § 240(1) (see Hargobin v. K.A.F.C.I. Corp., 282 A.D.2d 31, 35; Wescott v. Shear, 161 A.D.2d 925, appeal dismissed 76 N.Y.2d 846), the shortness of the distance of plaintiff's fall — at least two feet according to plaintiff, no more than 16 inches according to defendants — is irrelevant (see Siago v. Garbade Constr. Co., 262 A.D.2d 945; Binetti v. MK W. St. Co., 239 A.D.2d 214, 214-215; Norton v. Bell Sons, 237 A.D.2d 928, 929;see also Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co., 78 N.Y.2d 509, 514). Furthermore, plaintiff's proof that he fell when the staircase collapsed established a prima facie case of liability under Labor Law § 240(1) (see Greco v. Archdiocese of N.Y., 268 A.D.2d 300, 301), and, there being no evidence that plaintiff's conduct was the sole proximate cause of the accident, the manner in which he fell or how he landed is also irrelevant (see Laquidara v. HRH Constr. Corp., 283 A.D.2d 169; Angeles v. Goldhirsch, 268 A.D.2d 217).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Megna v. Tishman Constr. Corp. of Manhattan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 19, 2003
306 A.D.2d 163 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

In Megna, plaintiff, an elevator helper at a construction site, was injured when a temporary two-step wooden staircase leading to a temporary wooden landing collapsed under his weight and he fell to the ground.

Summary of this case from Brown v. 44th Street Development, LLC

In Megna, plaintiff, an elevator helper at a construction site, was injured when a temporary two-step wooden staircase leading to a temporary wooden landing collapsed under his weight and he fell to the ground.

Summary of this case from Brown v. 44th St. Dev., LLC
Case details for

Megna v. Tishman Constr. Corp. of Manhattan

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL MEGNA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TISHMAN CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 19, 2003

Citations

306 A.D.2d 163 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
762 N.Y.S.2d 63

Citing Cases

Morris v. City of N.Y.

Moreover, defendant contends, plaintiff did not fall to the ground, but allegedly fell into the wall, further…

DeRosa v. Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc.

Specifically, the truck was equipped with a ladder, located on the rear of its driver's side, which was…