From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meerholz v. Sessions

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 1858
9 Cal. 277 (Cal. 1858)

Opinion

         Appeal from the District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District, County of San Francisco.

         COUNSEL:

         H. S. Love, for Appellant.

          McDougall & Sharp, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: Field, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Terry, C. J., and Burnett, J., concurring.

         OPINION

          FIELD, Judge

         The statement embodied in the record was filed on the motion for a new trial, and we can only examine the action of the Court below in denying the motion. As the order was entered by consent, we cannot hear any objection to it on appeal.

         Judgment affirmed, with twenty per cent. damages.


Summaries of

Meerholz v. Sessions

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 1858
9 Cal. 277 (Cal. 1858)
Case details for

Meerholz v. Sessions

Case Details

Full title:MEERHOLZ v. SESSIONS

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Apr 1, 1858

Citations

9 Cal. 277 (Cal. 1858)

Citing Cases

McFadden v. Dietz

(Rules of the Supreme Court, rule II, subd. 4, v; Hickinbotham v. Monroe , 28 Cal. 489; Faris v. Lampson , 73…

Marino v. Kenoff & Machtinger

This doctrine is established in this state by a long line of decisions. (See Imley v. Beard, 6 Cal. 666;…