From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meeks ex rel. Z.M.B. v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Jun 10, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-20-286 (S.D. Tex. Jun. 10, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action H-20-286

06-10-2021

CHLOE M. MEEKS, on behalf of Z.M.B., Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION, DENYING THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION, AND REMANDING

Lee H. Rosenthal Chief United States District Judge

This court has reviewed the United States Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation on the cross-motions for summary judgment signed on April 27, 2021, and made a de novo determination. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir. 1989). Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the court adopts the Memorandum and Recommendation as this court's Memorandum and Order. This court finds and concludes that the Appeals Council erred in denying Z.M.B.'s request for review despite newly submitted evidence, and that the court cannot determine whether Z.M.B. was prejudiced by that error or whether the denial of benefits decision was based on substantial evidence. The plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, (Docket Entry No. 13), is granted; the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment, (Docket Entry No. 12), is denied. This matter is remanded with instructions to further develop the record consistent with this order.

An order of remand is separately entered.


Summaries of

Meeks ex rel. Z.M.B. v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Jun 10, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-20-286 (S.D. Tex. Jun. 10, 2021)
Case details for

Meeks ex rel. Z.M.B. v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:CHLOE M. MEEKS, on behalf of Z.M.B., Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Jun 10, 2021

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-20-286 (S.D. Tex. Jun. 10, 2021)

Citing Cases

Torrez v. Kijakazi

Similarly, if a doctor diagnosed a claimant with autism after the ALJ's decision, but the diagnosis was…