From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meehan v. Mobil Oil Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 4, 1994
201 A.D.2d 951 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 4, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Siracuse, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Green, Balio, Lawton and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to plaintiffs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Factual issues exist whether defendant Mutlu, the lessee of the premises, provided the ladder involved in this incident, whether the ladder was defective, and whether the accident was caused by the ladder, the alleged slippery condition of the floor, or a combination of both. Thus, Supreme Court erred in dismissing the common-law negligence causes of action asserted against Mutlu and defendant Mobil Oil Corp., the owner of the premises. We modify the order to reinstate those causes of action.

Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 241 (6) cause of action against Mobil and Mutlu (see, Gibson v. Worthington Div., 78 N.Y.2d 1108, 1109; Mordkofsky v. V.C.V. Dev. Corp., 76 N.Y.2d 573, 577; Meehan v Mobil Oil Corp., 184 A.D.2d 1021, 1022, lv dismissed 80 N.Y.2d 925).


Summaries of

Meehan v. Mobil Oil Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 4, 1994
201 A.D.2d 951 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Meehan v. Mobil Oil Corp.

Case Details

Full title:DONALD B. MEEHAN et al., Appellants, v. MOBIL OIL CORP. et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 4, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 951 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
610 N.Y.S.2d 907