From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Medrano v. New Tech, LLC

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
May 16, 2017
Record No. 0154-17-3 (Va. Ct. App. May. 16, 2017)

Opinion

Record No. 0154-17-3

05-16-2017

EDWIN RUDOLFO ROMERO MEDRANO v. NEW TECH, LLC AND ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE

(J. William Snyder, Jr.; The Law Offices of Will Snyder, P.L.L.C., on brief), for appellant. (Richard D. Lucas; Lucas & Kite, PLC, on brief), for appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Present: Judges Humphreys, O'Brien and Senior Judge Bumgardner MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (J. William Snyder, Jr.; The Law Offices of Will Snyder, P.L.L.C., on brief), for appellant. (Richard D. Lucas; Lucas & Kite, PLC, on brief), for appellees.

Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. --------

Edwin Rudolfo Romero Medrano appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission ("the Commission") finding that he was not entitled to workers' compensation benefits because he was not the direct employee of New Tech, LLC. We have reviewed the record and the Commission's opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Commission in its final opinion. See Medrano v. New Tech, LLC, JCN No. VA02000023023 (Va. Wrk. Comp. Dec. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Medrano v. New Tech, LLC

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
May 16, 2017
Record No. 0154-17-3 (Va. Ct. App. May. 16, 2017)
Case details for

Medrano v. New Tech, LLC

Case Details

Full title:EDWIN RUDOLFO ROMERO MEDRANO v. NEW TECH, LLC AND ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Date published: May 16, 2017

Citations

Record No. 0154-17-3 (Va. Ct. App. May. 16, 2017)