From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Medimmune, LLC v. PDL Biopharma

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Dec 16, 2009
No. C08-05590 JF (HRL) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2009)

Opinion

No. C08-05590 JF (HRL).

December 16, 2009


ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL [Re: Docket No. 191]


Pursuant to a 1997 agreement ("License Agreement") with defendant PDL Biopharma ("PDL"), plaintiff MedImmune LLC ("MedImmune") is licensed to practice certain PDL patents. MedImmune claims that PDL has breached certain provisions of the License Agreement. In this action, plaintiff seeks a declaration of noninfringement and invalidity as to the subject patents, as well as a declaration of contractual rights under the License Agreement.

Presently before the court is MedImmune's motion to compel answers to interrogatories and the production of documents. Plaintiff also requests leave to take more than the 10 depositions allotted under Fed.R.Civ.P. 30. PDL opposes the motion. The motion is also opposed by non-party Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Alexion"), who intervened in this matter to address certain Alexion documents sought by MedImmune. Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers, as well as the arguments of counsel, this court grants the motion in part and denies it in part as follows:

Shortly before the motion hearing, MedImmune withdrew a portion of its motion which sought modification of the Stipulated Protective Order, entered May 26, 2009, to permit certain former MedImmune executives to see PDL's claimed confidential information. The parties advise that they have reached an agreement as to that issue.

1. MedImmune's motion to compel a further response to Interrogatories 4 and 5 is granted. Defendant has not managed to persuade that supplemental responses should be deferred. PDL shall serve its supplemental responses to these interrogatories within 10 days from the date of this order. To the extent PDL later discovers information that requires correction of its responses, it has a continuing obligation to supplement pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(e).

2. MedImmune's motion to compel a further response to Interrogatory 13 is denied.

3. MedImmune's motion to compel production of Alexion's opinion letters produced to PDL in PDL Biopharma, Inc. v. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., C.A. No. 07-156-JJF (D. Del.) is denied. MedImmune has not convincingly demonstrated that the letters are relevant or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

4. Based on the discussion at the motion hearing, and both sides having indicated that they will likely need to take more than the 10 depositions permitted under Fed.R.Civ.P. 30, MedImmune's motion is granted as follows: Each side shall be permitted to take up to 15 depositions.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Medimmune, LLC v. PDL Biopharma

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Dec 16, 2009
No. C08-05590 JF (HRL) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2009)
Case details for

Medimmune, LLC v. PDL Biopharma

Case Details

Full title:MEDIMMUNE, LLC, Plaintiff, v. PDL BIOPHARMA, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Dec 16, 2009

Citations

No. C08-05590 JF (HRL) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2009)