From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mediaxposure Ltd. v. Omnireliant Holdings Inc.

Supreme Court of the State of New York. New York County
Oct 25, 2010
29 Misc. 3d 1215 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2010)

Summary

Holding that a party cannot amend its complaint with a new claim via an opposition brief

Summary of this case from Schroeder v. Pinterest Inc.

Opinion

October 25, 2010.


Employment Relationships — Breach of Fiduciary Duty. Evidence — Judicial Notice — Foreign Law.


Summaries of

Mediaxposure Ltd. v. Omnireliant Holdings Inc.

Supreme Court of the State of New York. New York County
Oct 25, 2010
29 Misc. 3d 1215 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2010)

Holding that a party cannot amend its complaint with a new claim via an opposition brief

Summary of this case from Schroeder v. Pinterest Inc.
Case details for

Mediaxposure Ltd. v. Omnireliant Holdings Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MediaXposure Ltd. (Cayman) v. Omnireliant Holdings, Inc

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. New York County

Date published: Oct 25, 2010

Citations

29 Misc. 3d 1215 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 51835
918 N.Y.S.2d 398

Citing Cases

Zutty v. Rye Select Broad Mkt. Prime Fund, L.P.

However, the complaint contains no such causes of action. It is well settled that claims asserted for the…

Zutty v. Rye Select Broad Mkt. Prime Fund, L.P.

However, the complaint contains no such causes of action. It is well settled that claims asserted for the…