From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Medeiros v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 3, 2004
866 So. 2d 778 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 4D03-3007.

Opinion filed March 3, 2004.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County, Robert R. Makemson, Judge, L.T. Case No. 00-1 CFA.

Christopher Paul Medeiros, Miami, pro se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Laurel R. Wiley, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Christopher Medeiros appeals the summary denial of his postconviction motion. In ground one, Medeiros alleged that his trial attorney provided ineffective assistance by not impeaching a key state witness with an inconsistent statement from his deposition. During the deposition, the witness admitted writing two statements that recanted the information he provided to police. At trial, he denied writing the first statement. In the first statement, the witness explained why he gave the police false information. At trial, after the witness denied writing the first statement, there were no further questions about it and it was not received or proffered into evidence.

Medeiros's postconviction motion states a legally sufficient claim that is not refuted by the record attached to the circuit court's order. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing or for attachment of portions of the record that conclusively demonstrate appellant is entitled to no relief.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

STONE, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Medeiros v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 3, 2004
866 So. 2d 778 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Medeiros v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER PAUL MEDEIROS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 3, 2004

Citations

866 So. 2d 778 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)