From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meck v. Stanford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 31, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 69750 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

DOCKET NO. CA 16-01149

03-31-2017

IN THE MATTER OF DAVID MECK, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. TINA M. STANFORD, CHAIRWOMAN, NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF PAROLE, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.


PRESENT:

Appellant having moved for permission to proceed as a poor person and for assignment of counsel on the appeal taken herein from an order of the Supreme Court entered in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Erie on April 5, 2016,

Now, upon reading and filing the affidavit of David Meck sworn to March 7, 2017, and the notice of motion with proof of service thereof, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is hereby ORDERED that the motion is denied.

Memorandum: Appellant failed to include an affidavit setting forth sufficient facts so that the merit of the contentions can be ascertained (see CPLR 1101 [a]; 22 NYCRR 1000.14 [a] [2]).

Entered: March 31, 2017

Frances E. Cafarell, Clerk


Summaries of

Meck v. Stanford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 31, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 69750 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Meck v. Stanford

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF DAVID MECK, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. TINA M. STANFORD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 31, 2017

Citations

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 69750 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)