From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mead v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 7, 1983
438 So. 2d 410 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 82-2203.

September 6, 1983. Rehearing Denied October 7, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Arthur I. Snyder, J.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Kalter Kutner, Miami and Robert Kalter, Sp. Appointed Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Calvin L. Fox, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART, DANIEL S. PEARSON, and FERGUSON, JJ.


The defendant James William Mead appeals his conviction for first degree murder entered below. His sole point on appeal is that the state failed to adduce sufficient evidence at trial to establish the essential element of premeditation herein. We reject this contention upon a holding that the defendant's statement to the police, which was admitted in evidence below, adequately established the above-stated element of premeditation in this case. Sireci v. State, 399 So.2d 964, 967 (Fla. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 984, 102 S.Ct. 2257, 72 L.Ed.2d 862 (1982).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Mead v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 7, 1983
438 So. 2d 410 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Mead v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES WILLIAM MEAD, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 7, 1983

Citations

438 So. 2d 410 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Mena v. State

The evidence of guilt in this case was more than sufficient to submit to the jury on the charges of first…