From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mead v. Sherwood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 28, 1966
25 A.D.2d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)

Opinion

April 28, 1966


Amended judgment in favor of defendants unanimously reversed, on the law, and a new trial ordered, with $50 costs to abide the event. We agree with the trial court that when plaintiffs in this personal injury action rested they had proved a prima facie case and it was proper to deny defendants' motion to dismiss. Accordingly, when defendants also rested after such denial, the issues should have been submitted to the jury and not determined by the court, notwithstanding that motions for direction of a verdict were made by both sides ( Squillante v. Los Cab Corp., 23 A.D.2d 656).

Concur — Botein, P.J., Breitel, Rabin and Steuer, JJ.


Summaries of

Mead v. Sherwood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 28, 1966
25 A.D.2d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)
Case details for

Mead v. Sherwood

Case Details

Full title:ISOLINA MEAD et al., Appellants, v. RODOLFO E. SHERWOOD et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 28, 1966

Citations

25 A.D.2d 744 (N.Y. App. Div. 1966)