From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Md. Shall Issue, Inc. v. Moore

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 11, 2024
21-2017 (L) (4th Cir. Jan. 11, 2024)

Summary

acknowledging that several courts have held that the Second Amendment is not limited to “ordinary, law-abiding adult citizens” but declining to address the issue

Summary of this case from United States v. King

Opinion

21-2017 (L) 1:16-cv-03311-ELH

01-11-2024

MARYLAND SHALL ISSUE, INC., for itself and its members; ATLANTIC GUNS, INC.; DEBORAH KAY MILLER; SUSAN BRANCATO VIZAS Plaintiffs - Appellants v. WES MOORE, in his capacity as Governor of Maryland; WOODROW W. JONES, III, Colonel Defendants - Appellees and ANA SLIVEIRA; CHRISTINE BUNCH Plaintiffs FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, INC.; FPC ACTION FOUNDATION; INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE Amici Supporting Appellant


UNPUBLISHED

ORDER

A majority of judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in a requested poll of the court to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that rehearing en banc is granted.

The parties shall file 16 additional paper copies of their briefs and appendices previously filed in this case within 10 days.

This case is tentatively scheduled for oral argument during the March 19-22, 2024, oral argument session in Richmond, Virginia.


Summaries of

Md. Shall Issue, Inc. v. Moore

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 11, 2024
21-2017 (L) (4th Cir. Jan. 11, 2024)

acknowledging that several courts have held that the Second Amendment is not limited to “ordinary, law-abiding adult citizens” but declining to address the issue

Summary of this case from United States v. King
Case details for

Md. Shall Issue, Inc. v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:MARYLAND SHALL ISSUE, INC., for itself and its members; ATLANTIC GUNS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jan 11, 2024

Citations

21-2017 (L) (4th Cir. Jan. 11, 2024)

Citing Cases

Kipke v. Moore

Plaintiffs also cite Maryland Shall Issue, Inc. v. Moore, 86 F.4th 1038, 1047-49 (4th Cir. 2023), reh'g en…

Vt. Fed'n of Sportsmen's Clubs v. Birmingham

(“We find it especially difficult to square the [Fourth Circuit's] conclusion that a thirty-day review period…