From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McZeal v. Southern Consumers Coop, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana
May 7, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-1080 (W.D. La. May. 7, 2009)

Summary

denying motion for summary judgment seeking constructive trust where plan was top hat unfunded plan because such plans "have no assets separate from the general corporate assets"

Summary of this case from In re Washington Mutual, Inc.

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-1080.

May 7, 2009


JUDGMENT


For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law, and considering the objections to the Report and Recommendation in the record;

IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motions for Partial Summary Judgment [rec. docs. 74 and 84] be DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all of plaintiff's claims under ERISA for breach of fiduciary duties, his request for declaratory judgment and equitable relief under ERISA, as well as plaintiff's negligence and all other claims asserted under Louisiana state law be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, in Lafayette, Louisiana.


Summaries of

McZeal v. Southern Consumers Coop, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana
May 7, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-1080 (W.D. La. May. 7, 2009)

denying motion for summary judgment seeking constructive trust where plan was top hat unfunded plan because such plans "have no assets separate from the general corporate assets"

Summary of this case from In re Washington Mutual, Inc.

denying motion for summary judgment seeking constructive trust where plan was top hat unfunded plan because such plans “have no assets separate from the general corporate assets”

Summary of this case from In re Washington Mutual, Inc.
Case details for

McZeal v. Southern Consumers Coop, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ALFRED McZEAL, SR. v. SOUTHERN CONSUMERS COOP, INC., ET AL

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Date published: May 7, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-1080 (W.D. La. May. 7, 2009)

Citing Cases

LOFFREDO v. DAIMLER AG

Courts in several circuits, including the Sixth Circuit, have determined that top-hat plan fiduciaries and…

In re Washington Mutual, Inc.

The Debtors argue that, even if the Plan Participants did timely and properly request payments from the…