From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McVay v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Jan 22, 2010
CASE NO. 3:07-CV-1101-O (N.D. Tex. Jan. 22, 2010)

Summary

holding that "there is no requirement that a party refuse to honor the arbitration award before a court can confirm the award"

Summary of this case from Decapolis Grp., LLC v. Mangesh Energy, Ltd.

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:07-CV-1101-O.

January 22, 2010


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

So ORDERED.


Summaries of

McVay v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Jan 22, 2010
CASE NO. 3:07-CV-1101-O (N.D. Tex. Jan. 22, 2010)

holding that "there is no requirement that a party refuse to honor the arbitration award before a court can confirm the award"

Summary of this case from Decapolis Grp., LLC v. Mangesh Energy, Ltd.
Case details for

McVay v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CHESTER SHANE McVAY, Plaintiff, v. HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Jan 22, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 3:07-CV-1101-O (N.D. Tex. Jan. 22, 2010)

Citing Cases

Tres Tech Corp. v. Carefusion Corp.

Though neither the Award nor the Supplemental Award provide for interest on the award, this does not prevent…

Ray v. Chafetz

The Court's judgment in this matter is a "money judgment" that falls within the purview of § 1961. See Mediso…