Opinion
TC-MD 120707N
10-08-2012
JEREMY McQUILLAN and PAMELA McQUILLAN, Plaintiffs v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant.
DECISION OF DISMISSAL
ALLISON R. BOOMER MAGISTRATE
This matter is before the court on its own motion to dismiss this case for lack of prosecution.
A case management conference was scheduled at 1:30 p.m. on September 19, 2012, to consider Plaintiffs' appeal. On August 29, 2012, the court sent notice of the scheduled case management conference to Plaintiffs at the email address Plaintiffs provided to the court. The notice was not returned as undeliverable. The notice advised that if Plaintiffs did not appear, the court might dismiss the appeal.
On September 19, 2012, the court sent Plaintiffs a letter which explained the importance of diligently pursuing an appeal. That letter was not returned as undeliverable. The letter advised that if Plaintiffs did not provide a written explanation by October 4, 2012, for their failure to appear, the court would dismiss the appeal. As of this date, Plaintiffs have not submitted a written response to the court explaining their failure to appear at the September 19, 2012, case management conference. Under such circumstances, the court finds the appeal must be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Now, therefore, IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that the Complaint is dismissed.