From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McPherson v. Warden

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 29, 2023
2:23-cv-1014 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-1014 WBS KJN P

09-29-2023

MICHAEL BRUCE ANTHONY MCPHERSON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On August 23, 2023, respondent filed a motion to dismiss this action because it is barred by the statute of limitations. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(1) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” Id.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner show cause, within twenty-one days, why his failure to oppose respondent's motion to dismiss should not be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, and he shall file an opposition. Petitioner is cautioned that failure to respond to the instant order, or to file an opposition to the pending motion to dismiss, will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.


Summaries of

McPherson v. Warden

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 29, 2023
2:23-cv-1014 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2023)
Case details for

McPherson v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL BRUCE ANTHONY MCPHERSON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 29, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-1014 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2023)