From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNutt v. Grange Ins. Co.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Jan 5, 2022
3:21-cv-00298 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 5, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-cv-00298

01-05-2022

HARRY McNUTT v. GRANGE INSURANCE COMPANY; SASAN PASHA; S.E.F.C. ENGINEERING, INC.; JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS I-X; AND, JEFFREY WIGAND


ORDER

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Magistrate Judge Holmes has issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 20) in which she recommends that this action be dismissed. No. objections have been filed.

Having reviewed the matter de novo as required by Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition that the case be dismissed for failure to prosecute as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(f) and 41(b), and Local Rule 7.01(a)(3). Among other things, Plaintiff failed to appear at the initial case management conference; failed to participate in the preparation and filing of a joint proposed initial case management order; and failed to respond to pending motions to dismiss.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 20) is ACCEPTED and APPROVED, and this case is hereby DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court shall TERM the pending Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 12, 14, 16) as moot, and close this file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McNutt v. Grange Ins. Co.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Jan 5, 2022
3:21-cv-00298 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 5, 2022)
Case details for

McNutt v. Grange Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:HARRY McNUTT v. GRANGE INSURANCE COMPANY; SASAN PASHA; S.E.F.C…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Jan 5, 2022

Citations

3:21-cv-00298 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 5, 2022)