From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNutt v. Garick Fire Protection

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso
Sep 28, 2006
225 S.W.3d 657 (Tex. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 08-06-00075-CV.

September 28, 2006.

Appeal from the 171st District Court of El Paso County, Texas (TC # 2005-1919), Yvonne Rangel, Judge.

Dale Wayne McNutt, El Paso, pro se.

Mark Gregory Briggs, Porras, Stephen Briggs, El Paso, for appellee.

Before McCLURE, J., CHEW, J., and BARAJAS, C.J. (Ret.).


OPINION


Dale W. McNutt d/b/a Club Helios appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of Garick Fire Protection, Inc. In its response to McNutts brief, Garick states the following:

Appellee has no good faith basis to argue in support of the judgment in this case. There are errors in the judgment entered by the court below. Such errors may not be rectified on appeal.

Accordingly, Appellee agrees that judgment entered in the above-captioned cause is erroneous and should be reversed and that case be remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

Reversal is proper where the appellee confesses error. Ervin v. Wichita County Family Court Services, 533 S.W.2d 947, 951 (Tex.Civ.App.-Fort Worth 1976, no writ). Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

BARAJAS, C.J., (Ret.) (Sitting by Assignment).


Summaries of

McNutt v. Garick Fire Protection

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso
Sep 28, 2006
225 S.W.3d 657 (Tex. App. 2006)
Case details for

McNutt v. Garick Fire Protection

Case Details

Full title:Dale Wayne McNUTT d/b/a Club Helios, Appellant, v. GARICK FIRE PROTECTION…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso

Date published: Sep 28, 2006

Citations

225 S.W.3d 657 (Tex. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Spencer v. Dextral Capital, LP

See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2; McNutt v. Garick Fire Prot., Inc., 225 S.W.3d 657, 657-58 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2006,…

In re Interest of C.A.W.

Reversal is proper where an appellee, including DFPS, confesses error. See In re J.W., No. 13-14-00559-CV,…