From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNulty v. McNulty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 10, 1907
119 App. Div. 150 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)

Opinion

May 10, 1907.

James A. MacElhinny, for the appellant.

W.J. Walsh, for the respondent.

Present — PATTERSON, P.J., McLAUGHLIN, HOUGHTON, SCOTT and LAMBERT, JJ.


Plaintiff is the wife of defendant and brings this action for a separation on the grounds of cruelty. Her testimony shows that on several occasions the defendant kicked and beat her and frequently falsely accused her of adultery and other misconduct. While denying most of these accusations the defendant partially admits some of them.

We are of the opinion that the plaintiff established good ground for a decree of separation and that her complaint should not have been dismissed. From the evidence now before us it is manifest that the conduct and attitude of defendant toward the plaintiff is such that she ought not to be compelled to live with him.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.


Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event.


Summaries of

McNulty v. McNulty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 10, 1907
119 App. Div. 150 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
Case details for

McNulty v. McNulty

Case Details

Full title:MARY E. McNULTY, Appellant, v . PATRICK J. McNULTY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 10, 1907

Citations

119 App. Div. 150 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
104 N.Y.S. 251

Citing Cases

Knapp v. Knapp

SHIENTAG, J. (Dissenting). The very findings of the trial court established certain cruel and inhuman…

Averett v. Averett

The opportunity for an analysis of the testimony by an examination of the record, therefore, was not had by…