From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNeill v. Cortez

Supreme Court of Colorado. In Department
Oct 23, 1961
365 P.2d 687 (Colo. 1961)

Opinion

No. 19,882.

Decided October 23, 1961.

From a judgment affirming denial of a liquor license, the applicant brings error.

Reversed.

1. INTOXICATING LIQUORS — License — Denial. Where record discloses that only one such outlet as that for which license is sought has been authorized in entire county, located at a distance of twenty-five miles from city where applicant resides, license to sell 3.2 beer was unlawfully denied by city council.

Error to the District Court of Montezuma County, Hon. James N. Noland, Judge.

Messrs. ARMSTRONG THOMPSON, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. DILTS AND HANCOCK, for defendants in error.


McNEILL, the plaintiff in error, applied to the city council of the city of Cortez for the issuance of a license to sell a fermented malt beverage, (3.2) beer.

It is disclosed by the record before us that only one such outlet has been authorized in the entire county of Montezuma, and that it is located at a distance of twenty-five miles from the city of Cortez. The application for the license was denied by the city council and in the district court the action of the council was upheld.

The pertinent facts in all respects are the same as those present in the case of The KBT Corporation v. Walker, 148 Colo. 274, 365 P.2d 685. All that is said in the opinion in that case is fully applicable here.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court with directions to order issuance of the license.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE HALL and MR. JUSTICE FRANTZ concur.


Summaries of

McNeill v. Cortez

Supreme Court of Colorado. In Department
Oct 23, 1961
365 P.2d 687 (Colo. 1961)
Case details for

McNeill v. Cortez

Case Details

Full title:DAVE McNEILL v. THE CITY COUNCIL OF CORTEZ, ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Colorado. In Department

Date published: Oct 23, 1961

Citations

365 P.2d 687 (Colo. 1961)
365 P.2d 687

Citing Cases

Hirsch v. Board of Trustees

Such a statement is totally unsupported. It can be assumed that such a bald pronouncement had references to…

County Comm. v. Johnson

"We have held many times that where there is no liquor outlet of a given classification within a radius of…