From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNeill-Marks v. MidMichigan Med. Ctr.-Gratiot

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Jan 24, 2017
SC: 154159 (Mich. Jan. 24, 2017)

Opinion

SC: 154159

01-24-2017

TAMMY McNEILL-MARKS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MIDMICHIGAN MEDICAL CENTER-GRATIOT, Defendant-Appellant.


Order

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice Robert P. Young, Jr. Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 326606
Gratiot CC: 14-011876-NZ

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 16, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether the plaintiff's communication with her attorney constitutes a report to a public body within the meaning of MCL 15.361(d) and MCL 15.362 such that it is protected activity under the Whistleblowers' Protection Act, MCL 15.361 et seq. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 24, 2017

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

McNeill-Marks v. MidMichigan Med. Ctr.-Gratiot

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Jan 24, 2017
SC: 154159 (Mich. Jan. 24, 2017)
Case details for

McNeill-Marks v. MidMichigan Med. Ctr.-Gratiot

Case Details

Full title:TAMMY McNEILL-MARKS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MIDMICHIGAN MEDICAL…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Jan 24, 2017

Citations

SC: 154159 (Mich. Jan. 24, 2017)