From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNeil v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Jun 25, 2024
No. 01-23-00689-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 25, 2024)

Opinion

01-23-00689-CR

06-25-2024

Dantravias Jamal McNeil v. The State of Texas


Trial court: 230th District Court of Harris County No. 1686685

ORDER

VERONICA RIVAS-MOLLOY JUDGE

Appellant Dantravias Jamal McNeil's court-appointed counsel, James F. Pons, filed both a brief concluding that the above-referenced appeal is frivolous and a motion to withdraw as defense counsel. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Counsel apparently did not forward a copy of his motion to withdraw to Appellant. In addition, the motion to withdraw is deficient because it does not comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5. The motion does not include the contents enumerated in Rule 6.5(a) or state that it was "delivered to the party in person or mailed-both by certified and by first-class mail-to the party at the party's last known address" pursuant to Rule 6.5(b). See Tex. R. App. P. 6.5.

We order James F. Pons to file an amended motion to withdraw compliant with Rule 6.5(a) within seven days of the date of this order. We further order counsel to forward a copy of the amended motion to withdraw to Appellant.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

McNeil v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Jun 25, 2024
No. 01-23-00689-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 25, 2024)
Case details for

McNeil v. State

Case Details

Full title:Dantravias Jamal McNeil v. The State of Texas

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston

Date published: Jun 25, 2024

Citations

No. 01-23-00689-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 25, 2024)