From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNeil v. Solano Cnty. Det. Facilities

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 2, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-0044 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:13-cv-0044 CKD P

04-02-2013

DANIEL MCNEIL, Plaintiff, v. SOLANO COUNTY DETENTION FACILITIES, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of civil rights. Plaintiff has consented to have a magistrate judge conduct all proceedings in this case. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). By order filed February 14, 2013, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

______________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

McNeil v. Solano Cnty. Det. Facilities

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 2, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-0044 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2013)
Case details for

McNeil v. Solano Cnty. Det. Facilities

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL MCNEIL, Plaintiff, v. SOLANO COUNTY DETENTION FACILITIES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 2, 2013

Citations

No. 2:13-cv-0044 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2013)