From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNeil v. Acura of Valley Stream

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 1994
201 A.D.2d 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 22, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We find that the affidavit submitted by the plaintiffs was sufficient to warrant denial of the appellant's motion for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 (f). We have considered the appellant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Ritter, J.P., Pizzuto, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McNeil v. Acura of Valley Stream

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 1994
201 A.D.2d 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

McNeil v. Acura of Valley Stream

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS I. McNEIL et al., Respondents, v. ACURA OF VALLEY STREAM…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 22, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
609 N.Y.S.2d 837