From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNeal v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 26, 1990
567 So. 2d 47 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 88-01539.

September 26, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Harry Lee Coe, III, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Wendy Friedberg, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Candance Sunderland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


The appellant contends, and the appellee agrees, that upon revocation of community control or probation, based upon a single violation, a trial court is limited under the sentencing guidelines to a one cell "bump-up." Franklin v. State, 545 So.2d 851 (Fla. 1989). Thus, the defendant's sentence beyond the one cell "bump-up" was an unauthorized departure from the sentencing guidelines.

Reversed and remanded for resentencing.

LEHAN, A.C.J., and FRANK and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McNeal v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 26, 1990
567 So. 2d 47 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

McNeal v. State

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL L. McNEAL, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Sep 26, 1990

Citations

567 So. 2d 47 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)