From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNeal v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OXFORD DIVISION
Apr 8, 2021
NO. 3:20CV331-MPM-JMV (N.D. Miss. Apr. 8, 2021)

Opinion

NO. 3:20CV331-MPM-JMV

04-08-2021

KAREN McNEAL PLAINTIFF v. ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY DEFENDANT


ORDER

Before the Court is a motion to substitute the plaintiff [12]. According to the motion, which is supported by a copy of a death certificate, Plaintiff Karen McNeal passed away on March 1, 2021. The motion requests that Plaintiff's son, Chase McNeal, be substituted as the plaintiff in this action. Ms. McNeal initiated this Social Security appeal pro se on December 17, 2020. According to the amended complaint [6], filed January 7, 2021, Ms. McNeal's claim is for review of a decision of the Commissioner which denied her claim for disability insurance benefits ("DIB"). Counsel for the Commissioner, who has been granted an extension of time in which to file an answer herein, has advised the Court that the defendant has no objection to the motion for substitution.

See Order [11] dated March 22, 2021.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1) provides, "If a party dies and the claim is not extinguished, the court may order substitution of the proper party . . . If [a] motion [for substitution] is not made within 90 days after service of a statement noting the death, the action . . . must be dismissed." Ultimately, then, three conditions must be satisfied before a party can be substituted, see FED.R.CIV.P. 25(a)(1): (1) the claim must survive the plaintiff's death; (2) the individual seeking to be substituted must be a "proper party"; and (3) the motion for substitution must be made "within 90 days after service of a statement noting the death." Id.

In DIB and SSI cases, the claim does not extinguish, and the proper party may be entitled to underpayments. See 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.503 and 416.542. And, since no statement noting the death of the claimant was served in this case prior to the filing of the instant motion, the 90-day period was not triggered. So, the Court has only left to address whether Mr. McNeal is a proper party.

If a claimant dies before she receives a DIB underpayment, certain other individuals may receive the underpayment pursuant to an order of priority. See 20 C.F.R. § 404.503(b). Generally, children who are not minors, not disabled, and not full-time students, are fifth in the order of priority. See 42 U.S.C. § 404(d)(5); 20 C.F.R. 404.503(b)(5). "A member of any of the enumerated classes eligible for a deceased claimant's benefits has standing to pursue the deceased claimant's benefits." Blanton ex rel. Blanton v. Astrue, No. 1:10-cv-2463, 2011 WL 2637224, at *2 (N.D. Ohio June 20, 2011), report and recommendation adopted, 2011 WL 2637248 (N.D. Ohio July 6, 2011) (citing Youghioheny & Ohio Coal Co. v. Webb, 49 F.3d 244, 247 (6th Cir.1995)). "An eligible individual, however, may receive such benefits only if there are no preceding eligible individuals in the order of priority." Id. (citing 20 C.F.R. § 404.503(b) and 42 U.S.C. § 404(d)). Though Mr. McNeal alleges he is the decedent's son and has produced the notice of substitution form he submitted to the Social Security Administration, there is no indication the agency has approved the substitution. Nor has Mr. McNeal otherwise submitted proof he is a proper person to be substituted in this action. Cf. Brown obo Brown v. Berryhill, Case No. 17-CV-11577, 2017 WL 5493362, at *1-2 (E.D. Mich. Sept. 8, 2017), report and recommendation adopted, 2017 WL 5898459 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 30, 2017) (finding action should be dismissed without prejudice for lack of standing for failure of parent of deceased claimant to affirmatively establish his right to benefits ahead of possible other claimants at higher priority levels under the Social Security regulations). Accordingly, the instant motion is DENIED without prejudice to Mr. McNeal's right to renew his motion—supported with sufficient proof of standing to pursue the DIB claim in this matter—within 90 days after 3/26/21.

The term "underpayment" includes "nonpayment where some amount of such benefits was payable. An underpayment may be in the form of an accrued unpaid benefit amount for which no check has been drawn or in the form of an unnegotiated check payable to a deceased individual." 20 C.F.R. § 404.501(a). --------

SO ORDERED this 8th day of April, 2021.

/s/ Jane M. Virden

U.S. Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

McNeal v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OXFORD DIVISION
Apr 8, 2021
NO. 3:20CV331-MPM-JMV (N.D. Miss. Apr. 8, 2021)
Case details for

McNeal v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:KAREN McNEAL PLAINTIFF v. ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OXFORD DIVISION

Date published: Apr 8, 2021

Citations

NO. 3:20CV331-MPM-JMV (N.D. Miss. Apr. 8, 2021)