From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNeal v. Evert

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 21, 2013
No. 2:05-cv-0441 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:05-cv-0441 GEB EFB P

02-21-2013

VERNON WAYNE McNEAL, Plaintiff, v. EVERT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On January 18, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 18, 2013, are adopted in full; and

2. The August 2, 2012 motion for summary judgment (Dckt. No. 141) filed by defendants Ginder, McCoy, Hooven, Chenoweth, Ervin, Chatham, and Barton is granted as to defendants Ginder, McCoy, Hooven, Chenoweth, and Barton and denied as to defendants Ervin and Chatham.

_________________________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

McNeal v. Evert

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 21, 2013
No. 2:05-cv-0441 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)
Case details for

McNeal v. Evert

Case Details

Full title:VERNON WAYNE McNEAL, Plaintiff, v. EVERT, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 21, 2013

Citations

No. 2:05-cv-0441 GEB EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)