From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNamara v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 21, 2006
32 A.D.3d 747 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

8093.

September 21, 2006.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Faviola A. Soto, J.), entered January 10, 2005, which denied the petition to annul respondents' determination denying petitioner's application for accident disability retirement benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-k (the Heart Bill), and dismissed the proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Jeffrey L. Goldberg, P.C., Lake Success (Chester P. Lukaszewski of counsel), for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Sharyn Rootenberg of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Marlow, Nardelli, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.


Objective medical evidence supports the Medical Board's finding that petitioner's cardiomyopathy is due to a mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction unrelated to his nonobstructive coronary artery disease or recently diagnosed and well-controlled hypertension, and suffices to rebut the statutory presumption that the cardiomyopathy is job related ( see Matter of Seldon v Kelly, 21 AD3d 840).


Summaries of

McNamara v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 21, 2006
32 A.D.3d 747 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

McNamara v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of THOMAS MCNAMARA, Appellant, v. RAYMOND KELLY, as Police…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 21, 2006

Citations

32 A.D.3d 747 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 6609
820 N.Y.S.2d 797

Citing Cases

Zaborowski v. Kelly

The determination was not arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion or contrary to law. Credible…

Zaborowski v. Keely

The determination was not arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion or contrary to law. Credible…