From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNamara v. Eastman Kodak Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1919
189 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)

Opinion

October, 1919.


Motion for reargument granted, and particularly on the question whether or not the court should have limited the jury in its consideration of the alleged fraud of Mullen in procuring the release, to the claim that the $300 was paid to the plaintiff as a gratuity only. Reargument to be had on October thirteenth.


Summaries of

McNamara v. Eastman Kodak Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1919
189 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)
Case details for

McNamara v. Eastman Kodak Company

Case Details

Full title:IRENE McNAMARA, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. EASTMAN KODAK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1919

Citations

189 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)