From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McNamara v. Bustamante

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug 13, 2021
334 So. 3d 345 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 5D20-2649

08-13-2021

Julia MCNAMARA, Petitioner, v. Stephen BUSTAMANTE, Respondent.

Kansas R. Gooden, of Boyd & Jenerette, P.A., Miami, and Kevin D. Franz, of Boyd & Jenerette, P.A., Boca Raton, for Petitioner. Nicholas A. Shannin, and Carol B. Shannin, of Shannin Law Firm, P.A., Orlando, for Respondent.


Kansas R. Gooden, of Boyd & Jenerette, P.A., Miami, and Kevin D. Franz, of Boyd & Jenerette, P.A., Boca Raton, for Petitioner.

Nicholas A. Shannin, and Carol B. Shannin, of Shannin Law Firm, P.A., Orlando, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Younkin v. Blackwelder, 332 So.3d 1032 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019), review granted, No. SC19-385, 2019 WL 2180625 (Fla. May 21, 2019) ; Dodgen v. Grijalva, 281 So. 3d 490 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019), review granted, SC19-1118, 2019 WL 4805833 (Fla. Oct. 1, 2019). We withhold issuance of the mandate pending the Florida Supreme Court's resolution of SC19-385 and SC19-1118.

EVANDER, HARRIS and SASSO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McNamara v. Bustamante

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug 13, 2021
334 So. 3d 345 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

McNamara v. Bustamante

Case Details

Full title:Julia MCNAMARA, Petitioner, v. Stephen BUSTAMANTE, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Aug 13, 2021

Citations

334 So. 3d 345 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)