From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McMillin v. Bridges

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg
Aug 10, 2023
No. 13-22-00173-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 10, 2023)

Opinion

13-22-00173-CV

08-10-2023

REAGAN BEN MCMILLIN, M.D., OPHTHALMIC CONSULTANTS OF TEXAS, P.A., AND VALLEY RETINA INSTITUTE, P.A., Appellants, v. MALLORY COTTON ANDJERAMY BRIDGES, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS NEXT FRIENDS, NATURAL PARENTS, AND AS WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES OF BABY BOY BRIDGES, Appellees.


On appeal from the 103rd District Court of Cameron County, Texas.

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GINA M. BENAVIDES JUSTICE

This cause is before the Court on the parties' joint motion to dismiss the appeal as moot. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Attached to the joint motion is a dismissal order signed by the trial court on July 26, 2023, stating that the parties have agreed to extinguish the controversy between them in toto. "Appeals of some interlocutory orders become moot because the orders have been rendered moot by subsequent orders." Hernandez v. Ebrom, 289 S.W.3d 316, 319 (Tex. 2009). "A case is moot when a justiciable controversy no longer exists between the parties or when the parties no longer have a legally cognizable interest in the outcome." Tex. Dep't of Fam. & Protective Servs. v. N.J., 644 S.W.3d 189, 192 (Tex. 2022). "A case may become moot at any time, including on appeal." Id. When an appeal becomes moot, we must dismiss it for want of jurisdiction. Id. (citing Heckman v. Williamson County, 369 S.W.3d 137, 162 (Tex. 2012); see also Betancourt v. Cotton, No. 13-22-00132-CV, 2022 WL 1414502, at *1 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi-Edinburg May 5, 2022, no pet.) (mem. op.).

Upon review of the motion to dismiss, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, this cause is reinstated, the motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed. Costs are taxed against appellants. See id. R. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties' request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained.


Summaries of

McMillin v. Bridges

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg
Aug 10, 2023
No. 13-22-00173-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 10, 2023)
Case details for

McMillin v. Bridges

Case Details

Full title:REAGAN BEN MCMILLIN, M.D., OPHTHALMIC CONSULTANTS OF TEXAS, P.A., AND…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg

Date published: Aug 10, 2023

Citations

No. 13-22-00173-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 10, 2023)