From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McMahill v. Bzoskie

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Aug 26, 2009
CV 08-7188-AHM (E) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2009)

Opinion

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          A. HOWARD MATZ, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Court approves and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

         IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Third Amended Complaint is dismissed without leave to amend; (2) the action is dismissed with prejudice as against all remaining Defendants at CSP Lancaster, but without prejudice as against any official at any other prison; and (3) Plaintiff's motion for transfer is denied.

          IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein by United States mail on Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants.


         LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

McMahill v. Bzoskie

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Aug 26, 2009
CV 08-7188-AHM (E) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2009)
Case details for

McMahill v. Bzoskie

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL MAURICE McMAHILL, Plaintiff, v. CMO DR. T. BZOSKIE, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Aug 26, 2009

Citations

CV 08-7188-AHM (E) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2009)